Los Angeles Federal Criminal Defense Attorney
En Espanol
Click to Call Free Case Evaluation Federal Criminal Defense Blog
Home Free Case Evaluation Attorneys Cases News Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us

Shortly before I moved on after 28 years of work as a Federal Public Defender, one of the younger attorneys I had the honor to mentor forwarded me an e-mail he'd received from an Assistant United States Attorney. The e-mail complained that my younger colleague was being extremely frustrating, that my colleague was making far too much of a "simple little case," that the client in the case was going to be deported no matter what, and that my colleague was forcing the prosecutor to "expend[ ] a tremendous amount of effort" on what the prosecutor characterized as a "silly issue." He ended his e-mail by asking, "Have you been hanging out with Carl Gunn?"

Some people would have been insulted by this, but I felt rather proud. Making as much as we can out of what the government sees as "simple little cases," litigating issues despite the government's view that they might be "silly," and "expend[ing] a tremendous amount of effort" on behalf of clients who have the full weight of the government thrown up against them – often with the government's view that the case is open and shut, or "simple" – is our calling as public defenders and defense attorneys. We all have our different reasons for doing it, but it's a crucial task – for our clients, our system, and ourselves. As Sir Thomas More was said to say in "A Man for All Seasons" in response to his future son-in- law's exclamation that he'd "cut down every law in England" to get at the devil: "Oh, and when the last law in England was down and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, all the laws being flat?"

I'm proud if "hanging out with Carl Gunn" means not just accepting the government's view that cases are "simple" and "little," that issues are "silly," and that we shouldn't expend resources on our clients. Hence the name of this blog: "Hanging out with Carl Gunn." I hope to offer some thoughts and ideas that the government may think are "silly," but I respectfully don't; that you can use in cases that the government may think are "simple," but aren't so simple when looked at more critically; and that are an entirely appropriate way to expend our resources. And in the spirit of this being a "hanging out" together, there might be guest bloggers from time to time with their "silly" ideas to offer. I hope you find some of the ideas on this blog helpful and offer whatever comments you might have to add to them.

Recent Posts in Criminal Defense Category

A Government Misunderstanding: About Pretrial Detention

Don’t you just hate it when you walk into that initial appearance and the government hands you that piece of paper titled, "Notice of Request for Detention"? And isn’t it ...
Continue reading "A Government Misunderstanding: About Pretrial Detention" »

Love May or May Not Be in the Air, But the New Sentencing Guideline Amendments Are

It’s that time of year. And, no, I’m not talking about it being spring and love being in the air. (Though hopefully it is for some of you.) It’s the time of year when the Sentencing ...
Continue reading "Love May or May Not Be in the Air, But the New Sentencing Guideline Amendments Are" »

Some Modest (or Immodest, as the Case May Be) Proposals for Our Clients' Multiple State And Federal Cases

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Setser v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 1463 (2012) on the power of a federal judge to order consecutive sentences brought to mind a problem that we run into ...
Continue reading "Some Modest (or Immodest, as the Case May Be) Proposals for Our Clients' Multiple State And Federal Cases" »

Some Last Thoughts on the Categorical Approach -- From a Guest

This week, we have a guest blogger – Deputy Federal Public Defender Sam Josephs. Sam clerked for both District Judge William Pauley in New York and Ninth Circuit Judge M. Smith. Sam had the good ...
Continue reading "Some Last Thoughts on the Categorical Approach -- From a Guest" »

More on the Categorical Approach for Applying Federal Prior Conviction Enhancement Statutes

BLOG BULLETS: Research the federal definition and the state statute. Don’t assume words mean what you – and most everyone else – think they mean. Don't assume the same words mean ...
Continue reading "More on the Categorical Approach for Applying Federal Prior Conviction Enhancement Statutes" »

Enhance Your Litigation Skills by Challenging Enhancements

Enhancement provisions in various federal criminal statutes and the sentencing guidelines have become ubiquitous over the last 20 years. Among the more important examples are the Armed Career Criminal ...
Continue reading "Enhance Your Litigation Skills by Challenging Enhancements" »

"Draft" Transcripts? Or the Better Originals?

For my first post on this blog, I thought I’d share an idea that comes out of an experience from a trial I did about 10 years ago. A Central District of California AUSA very reasonably provided ...
Continue reading ""Draft" Transcripts? Or the Better Originals?" »

SENDING THE WRONG MESSAGE: US v. SANCHEZ

In United States v. Sanchez, 10-50192 a panel of the Ninth Circuti Court of Appeal reversed the conviction of an alleged drug smuggler where the prosecutor told the jury in San Diego at trial that ...
Continue reading "SENDING THE WRONG MESSAGE: US v. SANCHEZ" »

STRIPPED OF ALL DIGNITY: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, New Jersey

In Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders , et al, 10-945, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on October 12, 2011 regarding whether the Fourth Amendment permits a jail to conduct ...
Continue reading "STRIPPED OF ALL DIGNITY: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, New Jersey" »

PENAL CODE 490.5: Civil Recovery for Sticky Fingers

You may be surprised to learn that California (and indeed all 50 states) has a so-called "civil recovery" statute on the books for shoplifting cases. Specifically, California Penal Code ...
Continue reading "PENAL CODE 490.5: Civil Recovery for Sticky Fingers" »

US v. JONES: EVERY STEP YOU TAKE, I'LL BE WATCHING YOU...

In November 2011, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. Jones, 10-1259 , to decide the issue whether law enforcement needs a search warrant to place a GPS device on a ...
Continue reading "US v. JONES: EVERY STEP YOU TAKE, I'LL BE WATCHING YOU..." »

UNITED STATES v. PEPPER: JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR GOES TO REHAB

In United States v. Pepper 09-6822 (March 2, 2011) the United States Supreme Court, in an Opinion by Justice Sotomayor, held that when a defendant's sentence is set aside on appeal, a district ...
Continue reading "UNITED STATES v. PEPPER: JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR GOES TO REHAB" »

MICHIGAN v. BRYANT - TESTIMONY FROM BEYOND

In Michigan v. Bryant 09-150 (February 28, 2011), a majority of the United States Supreme Court recently held a statement given to law enforcement by a wounded victim identifying the person who shot ...
Continue reading "MICHIGAN v. BRYANT - TESTIMONY FROM BEYOND" »

Welcome to our Los Angeles Criminal Defense Blog!

We are pleased to announce the launch of our new Los Angeles criminal defense law blog. We have an RSS feed available for you here .
Continue reading "Welcome to our Los Angeles Criminal Defense Blog!" »

Carl Gunn was an Assistant Federal Public Defender for over 28 years from 1983 through 2011, mostly in the Los Angeles office, but with additional three-year and four-month stints in Tacoma, Washington and Anchorage, Alaska, respectively. During much of his tenure, he supervised, trained, and/or mentored newer attorneys. He is now of counsel at Kaye, McLane, and Bednarski, where he specializes in federal criminal appellate practice and motions and sentencing support. He has a reputation for raising issues that lead prosecutors to make comments such as the one discussed in the far left column of this blog. Those comments also reflect prosecutorial concern about the successful outcomes raising such issues can produce – whether it's getting an acquittal, getting charges dismissed, or getting a much lower sentence or favorable plea agreement. For more on Mr. Gunn and the other attorneys at Kaye, McLane & Bednarski, Click Here.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 234 East Colorado Blvd, Suite 230, Pasadena, CA 91101 Phone: (877) 380-7210